Lecturers’ Speech Acts in Arabic Language Learning Interactions at UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Yogia Prihartini, Wahyudi Buska

Abstract


This study aims to describe the type and function of lecturers’ speech acts in the interaction of learning Arabic at UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi. Where in the classroom, the lecturers had important roles in the teaching and learning process. They always use speech as medium to convey ideas to students. Lecturers are also expected to function as active communicators in Arabic lectures. The interaction that is built by lecturers and students is inseparable from the speech act. A qualitative approach was implemented where the data taken from lecturer utterances in Arabic learning interactions were obtained from Arabic lecturers. Data collection was taken by using non-participant observation technique. Mechanical devices and stationery are positioned as data collection aids. Data analysis includes data reduction, data presentation, and data collection/verification results. The finding showed that the lecturers use five types of speech acts in Arabic learning interactions, namely directive, assertive, co missive, expressive, and declarative acts. The finding also showed that there are social and educational functions used by Arabic lecturers. Social functions consist of four categories, namely, competitive functions, convivial functions, collaborative functions, and conflictive functions. While, the educational function of lecturer speech acts consists of nine types, namely, giving a positive impression of the material, directing focus, inclusive learning situations, exclusive learning situations, expressing specific things, encouraging students to build conclusion, controlling the learning situation, and providing motivation to students. The results indicated that the lecturers' speech acts deal with social problems and learning objectives.

Keywords


Speech acts; interaction; Arabic language learning.

10.15548/jt.v27i1.597 Abstract view : 820 times PDF : 441 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amatari, V. O. (2015). The instructional process: A review of Flanders’ interaction analysis in a classroom setting. Int J Second Educ, 3(3), 43–49.

Atkins, A., & Brown, H. (2001). Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’model in a one-to-one classroom: An analysis. Retrieved June, 29, 2010.

Calero, H. H. (2005). The power of nonverbal communication: How you act is more important than what you say. Silver Lake Publishing.

Crandall, J. J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 34–55.

Creese, A. (2006). Supporting talk? Partnership teachers in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 434–453.

Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 434–452.

Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2000). What teachers need to know about language.

Gibson, J. W., Tesone, D. V., Blackwell, C. W., & Kelsey, R. L. (2002). Managing multi-directional communication in the online classroom. Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 92–103.

Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 257–279.

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118.

Goel, A. K., Rugaber, S., & Vattam, S. (2009). Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: The structure, behavior, and function modeling language. Ai Edam, 23(1), 23–35.

Golombek, P., & Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102–111.

Grewendorf, G., & Meggle, G. (2012). Speech acts, mind, and social reality: Discussions with John R. Searle (Vol. 79). Springer Science & Business Media.

Hardman, F., Abd-Kadir, J., & Smith, F. (2008). Pedagogical renewal: Improving the quality of classroom interaction in Nigerian primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 55–69.

Harnish, R. (2009). Internalism and externalism in speech act theory. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 5(1), 9–31.

Inamullah, H. M., Hussain, I., & Din, M. N. U. (2008). Teacher-students verbal interaction at the secondary level. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 5(9).

Inbar, O., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Shohamy, E. (2001). Students’ motivation as a function of language learning: The teaching of Arabic in Israel. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23, 297–311.

Kibble, R. (2006). Speech acts, commitment and multi-agent communication. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12(2–3), 127–145.

Leech, G., & Thomas, J. (2002). Language, meaning and context: Pragmatics. In An encyclopedia of language (pp. 105–124). Routledge.

Martin-Jones, M. (2000). Bilingual classroom interaction: A review of recent research i. Language Teaching, 33(1), 1–9.

Nurpahmi, S. (2017). Teacher Talk In Classroom Interaction. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 3(1), 34–43.

Origgi, G., & Sperber, D. (2000). Evolution, communication, and the

proper function of language.

Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15.

Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Newcomer, L. (2016). The Brief Student–Teacher Classroom Interaction Observation: Using dynamic indicators of behaviors in the classroom to predict outcomes and

inform practice. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(1), 32–42.

Sahlström, J. F. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 47–57.

Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 485–502.

Vieira, R., Moreira, Á. F., Wooldridge, M., & Bordini, R. H. (2007). On the formal semantics of speech-act based communication in an agent-oriented programming language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence

Research, 29, 221–267.

Walfajri, W. (2019). Tela’ah Buku Ajar Al-Balaghah Al-Wadhihah. Al-Fathin: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 31–46.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v27i1.597

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Al-Ta'lim Online Journal
Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.