Muhammad Zalnur


The purpose of the study is to describe the types of plagiarism done by the students in finishing their lesson tasks. There are three factors that made students did the plagiarism, namely: (1) take other writings and acknowledge them as their own writing, (2) take ideas from part of others’ writing and change to own language , and (3) take all parts of writings without changing the ideas  and language. The causes of plagiarism are: (1) the development of technology and information and, (2) high lessen studi.

10.15548/jt.v19i1.6 Abstract view : 2204 times PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) : 4043 times


Auer, N. & Krupar, E.M. 2001. Mouse click Plagiarism: The role of Technology in Plagiarism and the Librarian’s role in Combating it. Library Trends, 49 (3).

Bungin, B. 2003. Analisis data penelitian Kualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Pengusaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: P.T. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Chua Yan Piaw. 2006. Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill.

Creswell, J.W. 2005. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Denzin, NK & Lincoln, YS. 1994. "Introduction: Entering the Field of Qualitative Research.". Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Davis, S. F. 1993. Cheating in College is for a Career: Academic Dishonesty in the 1990s. Paper presented at Theannual Meeting of the Southeatern Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 382).

Doris, D. 1986. Plagiarism in High School. English Journal. 75(2): 81-4.

Fishbein, L. 1993. Curbing Cheating and Restoring Academic Integrity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40.

Flick, U. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative research. London: Sage Publication.

Gehring, D., E. M. Nuss dan G. Pavela. 1986. Issues and Perspectives on Academic Integrity. Columbus, OH: NASPA.

Hawley, C. S. 1984. The Thieves of Academe: Plagiarism in the University System. Improving College and University Teaching. 32: 35-39.

Jendrek, M.P. 1992. Students’ Reactions to Academic Dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development. 33: 260-73.

Kramer, Melinda G., Gleen Leggett, dan C. David Mead. 1995. Handbook For Writers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Sugiyono. 2005. Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Saunders, E. J. 1993. Confronting Academic Dishonesty. Journal of Social Work Education. 29(2): 224-31.

Schneider, A. 1999. Why professors don’t do more to stop students who cheat: some who have tried say that administrator, fearful or lawsuits, don’t back them up. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45 (30), 8-10.

Wiersma, W. 2000. Research method in education: An introduction. Needham Heights, NY: Allyn & Bacon.

Yin, R.K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Laird, E. 2001. We all pay for internet plagiarism. Education Digest. 67(3).

Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. G., 1994. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication Inc.

Rachmad, Edy. 2010. Fenomena Plagiarisme di Kampus. Jurnal Waspada. Medan. Dictionary. http://dictionary. - 22/4/03.

Utorodewo, Felicia, dkk. 2007. "Bahasa Indonesia: Sebuah Pengantar Penulisan Ilmiah". Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FEUI.

Wray, Alison dan Alleen Bloomer. 2006. Projects in Linguistics: Practical Guide to Researching Langguage. Oxfore University Prees



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2012 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Copyright © Al-Ta'lim Online Journal, Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893, All rights reserved

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.