Email this article 
The Comparison between National Final Examination Test Items and English Teacher Made-Test Items of 2010 and 2011
Abstract
The objective of the paper is to determine the relevance between the scope of the national final examination test items in English lesson and the English teacher made test items. It is also to identify the relevance between the deepness of national final examination test items in English subject and the English teacher made test item. The finding showed that more than fifty percents of tryout out test items are not relevant with the national test items. Meanwhile, the final national test items were design with higher cognitive domain than teacher made test items. It means the teacher made test items (tryout) is more superficial than final national test items. It can be a reason why the students who are can pass the tryout test which is made in teacher cannot pass the national final examination test (standardized test). It is expected that this study provides empirical evidence to devise on their optimal uses in EFL teaching.
Copyright © 2015 by Al-Ta'lim All right reserved
Keywords
10.15548/jt.v22i1.116
Abstract view : 650 times
PDF : 663 times
Full Text:
PDFReferences
______. (2007). Teaching by Principles; an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, USA: Longman.
Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Borg, W. R. & Gall. M. D. (1989). Educational Research; an Introduction, Fifth Edition, New York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices, USA: Longman.
Burns, M. K. (2008). What is Formative Evaluation? Minnesota Center for Reading Research.
Cartono. (2007). Assesmen dalam Pembelajaran Sains, Jakarta: Program Doktor Pendidikan IPA Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Indonesia.
Cebula, B. A. J. P. (1926). Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation; a Developmental Approach, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Coelho, C. et. al. (2005). Seminars in Speech and Language, volume 26, number 4.
Hale, J. (2011). The 3 Basic Types of Descriptive Research Methods. Psych Central. Retrieved on June 17, 2012. in http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2011/09/27/the-3-basic-types-of-descriptive-research-methods/.
Hamzah, B.U. (2006). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hardiato, D. Perencanaan Pembelajaran dalam Kerangka Penyelenggaraan Pelatihan. Retrieved on February 28, 2012. in http://staff.uny.ac.id/.pdf/.
Hedge, T. (2008). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hopkins, K.D.J.C.B.R. (1990). Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation, seventh edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hornby, A.S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, Sixth Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
http://smppegandon.net/2011/01/07/kriteria Kelulusan dan pelaksanaan UN Tahun 2010/2011, retrieved on June 13, 2012.
http://www.anneahira.com/pengertian-ujian-nasional.htm, retrieved on March 26, 2012.
http://www.britannica.com/ebchecked/topic/481664/. Retrieved on June 16, 2011 psychological-testing/23858/Teacher-made-versus-standardized-tests.
http://www.education.com/definition/teacher-made-tests/, Retrieved on June 16, 2011.
http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/NR/rdonlyres/C81E88FA-0F99-4233-8B3A-0C9FFF2C0695/14716/Ewaluacjakwestieog%C3%B3lneen1.doc, Retrieved on June, 13rd 2012.
http://www.ihmctan.edu/PDF/notes/Research_Methodology.pdf, Retrieved at June, 17th 2012.
http://www.interview.htm. Retrieved on March 26, 2012.
http://www.scribd.com/pakferdy996/d/44926328-SKL-UN-SMA-2011. Retrieved on April 2, 2012.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/relevancy. Retrieved on March 26, 2012.
Margono. (2005). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Masidjo, (1995). Ign. Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Moloeng, L.J. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nakarin, P. Building Effective English Teacher-Made Tests: a Major KPI for Thai ESP Teachers. Retrieved on June 13, 2012.http://sichon.wu.ac.th/file/arts-20090212-102632-Zqta5.pdf,.
Nasution, S. (1995). Kurikulum dan Pengajaran, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nawawi, H.H. (1991). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Piper, D. & Scharf, A. (2004). Descriptive Analysis-state of the Art and Recent Developments. Retrieved on June 17, 2012.
Posner, G.J. (2004). Analyzing and curriculum, USA: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Purwanto, N. (2004). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Tehnik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Purwanto. Pengertian Evaluasi, Pengukuran dan Penilaian dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Navel’s Blog.htm, Retrieved on June 16, 2011.
Richards, J.J.P.H.W. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics, England: Longman.
Strider, C. Qualitative Descriptive Research Method, (Online) http://www.eHow.pdf, Retrieved on June 13, 2012.
Subagyo, P.J. (1987). Metode Penelitian Dalam suatu Pengantar Kepada Teori Tes dan Pengukuran, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Subagyo, P.J. (1991). Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Subiyanto, J. (1998). Evaluasi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Sudjono. (2005). Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada Utama.
Taras, M. Assessment-Summative and Formative-some Theoretical Reflection, British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 53, No. 4, 2005.
Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2000). Evaluasi Program, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v22i1.116
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Al-Ta lim Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.