The Students’ Perceptions of National Examination Washback: A Case Study at MTS Daarul ‘Ulya Metro

Ahmad Madkur, Dedi Irwansyah

Abstract


Studies on washback of testing have been recently conducted. This demonstrates that there is a growing awareness that testing can have consequences beyond just the classroom. For one decade, Ministry of Education in Indonesia has administered National Examination (NE) as the standardized test for passing grade requirement. In spite of its good aim, NE has become one of controversial issues among educators, students and even parents. Some say yes while some others say no. This paper was mainly attempted to display some impacts, not all, of NE toward the test takers, the students. A qualitative research was employed where the data taken from observation and questionnaires to 20 students. The result of the study showed that most of the students felt unconfident with their score in National Examination due to the fact that their English competence was considered low. However, the difficulty of NE did not significantly affect their studying English language. In other words, the washback of NE on their study was negative.


Keywords


Washback; national examination; students’ perceptions

10.15548/jt.v25i2.405 Abstract view : 678 times PDF : 468 times

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amengual-Pizarro, M. (2009). Does the English Test in the Spanish university entrance examination influence the teaching of English? English Studies, 90(5), 582–598.

Andrews, S. (2004). Washback and curriculum innovation. In Washback in language testing (pp. 59–72). Routledge.

Aprianto, K. (2013). Validity and washback of english tests in the national examination. English Education Journal, 3(1).

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1–42.

Bailey, K. M. (1999). Washback in language testing. Educational Testing Service Princeton, NJ.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. Assessment and Learning, 9–25.

Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs: a comprehensive guide to English language assessement. McGraw-Hill College.

Brown, S. (2005). Assessment for learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 81–89.

Burrows, C. (2001). Searching for washback: The impact of assessment in the certificate in spoken and written English. Studies in Immigrant English Language Assessment, 2, 95–187.

Cheng, L. (2008). Washback, impact and consequences. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2479–2494). Springer.

Cheng, L., & Watanabe, Y. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Routledge.

Curtis, A., & Cheng, L. (2004). Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In Washback in language testing (pp. 25–40). Routledge.

Davidson, F., & Fulcher, G. (2009). Language Testing and Assessment: An Advanced Resource Book (Kindle Edition ed.). New York, USA: Routledge Applied Linguistics.

Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. Washback in Language Testing: Research Contexts and Methods, 191–210.

Gholami, V., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2013). The effect of weekly quizzes on students’ final achievement score. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(1), 36.

Graves, D. H. (2002). Testing is Not Teaching: What Should Count in Education. ERIC.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical

concerns. Language Testing, 14(3), 295–303.

Inggris, D. I. T. P. B. (2015). Ujian Nasional di Indonesia dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 243–255.

Jabbarifar, T. (2009). The importance of classroom assessment and evaluation in educational system. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–9).

James, M. (2008). Assessment and learning. In Unlocking assessment (pp. 34–49). David Fulton Publishers.

Muñoz, A. P., & Álvarez, M. E. (2010). Washback of an oral assessment

system in the EFL classroom. Language Testing, 27(1), 33–49.

Pan, Y.-C. (2016). A review of washback and its pedagogical implications. VNU Journal of Science: Foreign Studies, 25(4).

Roediger III, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 1–36). Elsevier.

Saukah, A. (2015). National Exam in Indonesia and its washback effects. Developing Indigenous Models of English Language Teaching and Assessment, 143–160.

Shaoshan, L. (2005). The washback of language testing and language testing design [J]. Foreign Language World, 1, 013.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

Shibliyev, J., & Gilanlıoğlu, İ. (2009). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Oxford University Press.

Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Routledge.

Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29.

Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. (2011). The washback effect of the English national examination (ENE) on English teachers’ classroom teaching and students’ learning. Kata Lama, 13(1), 96–111.

Sulistyo, G. H. (2014). Ujian Nasional (UN): harapan, tantangan, dan peluang. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 9(1).Sun, L. (2013). Thoughts on College English Testing. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(5).

Taylor, L. (2005). Washback and impact. ELT Journal, 59(2), 154–155.

Thaidan, R. (2015). Washback in language testing. Education Journal, 4(1), 5–8.

Watanabe, Y. (2004a). Methodology in washback studies. In Washback in language testing (pp. 41–58). Routledge.

---. (2004b). Teacher factors mediating washback. In Washback in language testing (pp. 151–168). Routledge.

Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i2.405

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Al-Ta lim Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Stats
Al-Ta’lim Journal published by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Al-Ta'lim Online Journal
Print ISSN 1410-7546 Online ISSN 2355-7893


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.