The Trends of Biology Education Research from 2000 to 2017: A Content Analysis for the Thesis of Pre-Service Teachers

M Haviz; Asma Dewi; Arlita Laras Putri; Asri Wahyuni; Najmiatul Fajar; Lufri Lufri

doi:10.15548/jt.v26i3.574

The Trends of Biology Education Research from 2000 to 2017: A Content Analysis for the Thesis of Pre-Service Teachers

M Haviz, Asma Dewi, Arlita Laras Putri, Asri Wahyuni, Najmiatul Fajar, Lufri Lufri

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the trend of biological education research (BER) from 2000 to 2017 in the thesis of pre-service biology teachers. This study conducted a series of content analyses of the thesis from two universities. A total 1347 thesis were analyzed in terms of sample, method, design, elements and topics and subject matter. It was found that junior and senior high school were the most popular research sample trends. This study was also found that quantitive, research and development or/and educational design research became the trend of the method most chosen and conducted by preservice biology teachers. This findings were also indicated that descriptive, experimental, and 4-D were design trends chosen by preservice biology teachers. This study was also found that cognitive and media of learning were the research elements are the most chosen and conducted by preservice biology teachers. The next findings showed that system and cell was the most popular of biology topic. This finding also indicated that Digestive System (DS) and Circulatory System (CS) and Features (KF) as the most chosen subject matter trends conducted by preservice teachers

Keywords

Trends; biology education research; content analysis; thesis of pre-service biology teacher.

10.15548/jt.v26i3.574

Abstract view : 1347 times

PDF : 590 times

Full Text:

PDF

References

Borg, W. R., dan Gall, M. R., 1989.Education Research. New York: Longman.

Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science,39(174), 33-38. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.3412

Çalık, M., Ünal, S., Coştu, B., & Karataş, Ö. F. (2008). Trends in Turkish Science Education.Essays in Education, 23-45, (Special Edition)

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views.Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71. doi: 10.5897/ERR11.205

Chang, Y. H., Chang, C. Y., & Tseng, Y. H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal Science Education Technology, 19, 315-331.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Derman, M. (2017). Biology education research in Turkey: Trend form 1989 to 2015. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14, 89-109.

Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62, 107-115.

Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2012). Multidimensional analysis of highschool students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129-139. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.634019

Gay, L.R., Miles, G.E and Airasian, P. (2011). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. (10th Edition). Pearson EducationInternatioanl, Boston.

Gul, S., & Sozbilir, M. (2015). Biology education research in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 11, 93-109.

Haviz, M, Adripen, Lufri, David, Maris I. M., & Fudholi, A. (2019). Assessing pre-service teachers’ perception on 21st century skills in Indonesia. Journal ofTurkish Science of Education (in review).

Haviz, M. (2013). Research and development: Penelitian di bidang kependidikan yang inovatif, produktif dan bermakna. Ta'dib, Volume 16, No. 1, 28-43.

Haviz, M. (2015). Cooperative learning model on developmental of biology. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 1298-1304. doi:10.12691/education-3-10-14

Haviz, M. (2016). Designing and developing the integrated learning model on embryology. Transylvanian Review, 24-7. Retrieved from http://transylvanianreviewjournal.org/index.php/TR/article/view/2998

Haviz, M. (2018a). Development of research-based learning model in biology education: What is relevance, concystency and practicality? Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(1), 143-149. doi:10.11591/edulearn.v12i1.6555

Haviz, M. (2018b). Computer-assisted biology learning materials: Designing and developing an interactive CD on spermatogenesis. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 335, 012081, pp. 1-7. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012081

Haviz, M. (2019). Teaching embryology through jigsaw cooperative learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education (in review).

Haviz, M., & Maris, I. (2018). Teaching quantitative research method with three methods of learning. Al-Ta’lim Journal, 25(3). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i3.394

Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, M. I., & Maris, I. M. (2018). Revisiting generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 355-363. doi:10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438.

Haviz, M., Novita, N., & Helmitha, R. (2018). Designing and developing teaching material of human anatomy with thinking map: what is internal relevance and consistency? Edusains, 10(1), 38-45.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health

Kaid, L. L. (1989). Content analysis. In P. Emmert & L. L. Barker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 197-217). New York: Longman.

Kondracki, N. L., & Wellman, N. S. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 224-230.

Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology(2ndEdition). London, Sage Publications, Inc.

Lee, M. H., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1999-2020.

Lin, C. T., Lin, J. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Research trend in science education from 2008 to 2012: Asystematics content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1346-1372.

Lufri. (2007). Strategi pembelajaran biologi. Padang: UNP Press.

Martono, N. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Analisis isi dan analisis data sekunder-Edisi revisi 2. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Plomp, T. (2010). Educational design research: As introduction. Dalam Tjeer Plomp and Nieeveen (Ed). An introduction to educational design research (p:9-35). Netherlands: www.slo.nl/organisatie/international/publications.

Reis, M. J. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Students’ understandings of human organs and organsystems. Research in Science Education, 31, 383–399. doi: 10.1023/A:1013116228261

Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2002). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development.

Rustaman, N. Y. (2012). Trend penelitian pendidikan: Kasus penelitian pendidikan sains. Proceding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Tahun 2012 (pp. 1-13). Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rustaman, N. Y., Dirdjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, S. A., Achmad, Y., Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., et al. (2003). Common textbook (Edisi revisi): Strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FMIPA UPI Bandung.Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel D, S., & Semmel, M.I. (1974). Instructional Development for Traning of Exceptional Children A Source Book. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped Indiana University Bloomington Indiana.

Tsai, C. C., & Wen, L. M. (2005). Research and trend in science education from 1998 to 2002. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 3-14.

Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., & Ozel, M. (2009). High school and university students’knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyEducation, 37(2), 123-130. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20267.

Yeşilyurt, S., & Gül, Ş. (2012). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin taşıma ve dolaşım sistemleri ünitesiile ilgili kavram yanılgıları [Secondary school students’ misconceptions about the“transportation and circulatory systems” unit]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 5(1), 17-48.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v26i3.574