Development of Computer Assisted Instruction as a Means of Independent Learning
Abstract
The development of Science, Technology, and Arts (IPTEKS) which so rapidly affects the process of implementing education can no longer be done conventionally. The learning methodology needs to adapt to these technological developments so that it can be carried out efficiently and effectively. This challenges education experts to continue to innovate in developing learning methods and strategies. How the learning process is carried out in a short time, and not always face to face between the lecturers and students but get the results as expected. One alternative to overcome this problem is to utilize computer-assisted instruction (CAI). This study aims to develop multi-media computer-assisted instruction (CAI) as a means of independent learning. This study uses the Multimedia Development Life Cycle method by Luther (1994), which includes six stages of development, namely concept (concept), design (design), material collection, assembly (manufacture), testing (testing), and distribution (distribution). At the testing stage, an alpha (alpha test) was carried out by the experts, while at the distribution stage the students were tested with indicators of usability, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction. Conclusion for all aspects of the overall validity, practicability, and feasibility test, it can be ignored that multi-media computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is valid, practical, and worthy of being used as a means of independent learning
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, Z. D., & Mustafa, K. I. (2019). The underlying factors of computer self-efficacy and the relationship with students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 346–354.
Adebisi, R. O., Liman, N. A., & Longpoe., P. K. (2015). Using Assistive Technology in Teaching.Children with Learning.Disabilities in the 21st Century. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 14-20.
Alaniz, K., & Wilson,.D. (2015). Naturalizing digital immigrants: The power of collegial coaching for technology integration. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W..(2016). Technology and.education: Computers, software and the internet. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 5, pp. 239-280). Elsevier.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking Education in the Age.of Technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S. (2014). Using.Technology to Support at-risk students' learning. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Eady, M., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for.learning: Technology and teaching. Learning to teach in the primary school, 71.
Eisenman, G., Edwards, S., & Cushman, C. A. (2015). Bringing.Reality to.Classroom Management in Teacher Education. Professional Educator, 39(1), n1.
Gardenhire, A., Diamond, J., Headlam, C., & Weiss, M. J. (2016). At Their Own Pace: Interim Findings from an Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted, Modular Approach to Developmental Math. MDRC.
Ghareb, M. I., & Mohammed, S. A. (2017). The future of technology-based classroom. UHD Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 27-32.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. Macmillan.
Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effects of e-learning on Students’ Motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181(2015), 423-430.
Hilton, A. (2018). Engaging primary school students in mathematics: Can iPads make a difference?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 145-165.
Hodson, H. (2014). Personalised learning lets children study at their own pace. The New Scientist.
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of computers in education, 2(4), 449-473.
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and teacher education, 29, 76-85.
Kim, J. H., Baylen, D. M., Leh, A., & Lin, L. (2015). Blended learning in teacher education: Uncovering its transformative potential for teacher preparation programs. In Handbook of research on enhancing teacher education with advanced instructional technologies (pp. 166-185). IGI Global.
Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12. Usability interface, 8(2), 3-6.
Luther, A. C. (1994). Authoring interactive multimedia. Academic Press Professional, Inc..
Murray, D. W., & Rabiner, D. L. (2014). Teacher use of computer-assisted instruction for young inattentive students: Implications for implementation and teacher preparation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 58-66.
Rose, M. A., Carter, V., Brown, J., & Shumway, S. (2017). Status of Elementary Teacher Development: Preparing Elementary Teachers to Deliver Technology and Engineering Experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 2-18.
Sivaram, R. T., & Ramar, R. (2014). Effect of CAI on Achievement of LD Students in English. Journal on English Language Teaching, 4(1), 12-17.
Soparat, S., Arnold, S. R., & Klaysom, S. (2015). The Development of Thai Learners' Key Competencies by Project-Based Learning Using ICT. Online Submission, 1(1), 11-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v29i3.675
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Ta lim Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






