Self-Translated Writing in Academic Writing: Students’ Experiences in the Classroom Setting
Abstract
Self-Translated Academic Writing Practice is a bridge or instrument for improved classroom communication. However, only some studies have examined how students incorporate translation into their foreign language writing. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how students engage in translation practice while writing in the classroom. To determine if there were any issues with the writing and translation practices, a brief exploration of experiences was conducted in class. Additionally, the correlation between translation activity and writing was investigated. The participant reported that these issues resulted from her limited vocabulary match due to the English text's readability. The translation procedure improves their English composition skills. According to the study results, more information is required about how self-translation operates in academic contexts; we need to learn more about the situations in which students self-translate when writing academic papers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al Aqad, M. H. (2014). Translation of legal texts between Arabic and English: The case study of marriage contracts. Arab World English Journal, 5(2), 110-121.
Alhaisoni, E., & Alhaysony, M. (2017). An Investigation of Saudi EFL University Students’ Attitudes towards the Use of Google Translate. International Journal of English Language Education, 5, 72-82.
Beiler, I. R., & Dewilde, J. (2020). Translation as translingual writing practice in English as an additional language. The modern language journal, 104(3), 533-549.
Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.
Cordingley, A. (2013). Introduction: Self-translation, going global. In A. Cordingley (Ed.), Self translation
Davies, M. G. (2004). Multiple voices in the translation classroom: Activities, tasks and projects (Vol. 54). John Benjamins Publishing.
Escudero, M. P., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Tracing convergence and divergence in pairs of Spanish and English research article abstracts. Ibérica, (21), 49-70.
Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation (No. 20). Cambridge University Press.
Gnutzmann, C., & Rabe, F. (2014). ‘Theoretical subtleties’ or ‘text modules’? German researchers’ language demands and attitudes across disciplinary cultures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.003
Gonzalez Davies, M. (2004). Multiple voices in the translation classroom: activities, tasks and projects
Inés GarcÃa de la Puente (2014) Autobiography in self-translation: language towards experience in Esmeralda Santiago’s Cuando era puertorriqueña, The Translator, 20:2, 215-227, DOI: 10.1080/13556509.2014.970790
Kim, J.H. (2010). A study on course design of Korean and Japanese interpretation and translation in undergraduate courses (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Busan University of Foreign Studies, Busan.
Kim, Y. (2007). Korean-English differences of communicative preferences with focus on the subject position. The Journal of Translation Studies, 8(2), 241–257.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English medium texts. Written Communication, 23, 3– 35. doi:10.1177/0741088305283754
Montgomery, S. L. (2009). English and science: Realities and issues for translation in the age of an expanding lingua franca. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 11, 6–16.
Pérez-Llantada, C., Plo, R., Ferguson, G., & Gibson, R. (2011). ‘You don’t say what you know, only what you can’: The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.001
Peterlin, A. P. (2014). Academic discourse in translation: Trainee translators' performance, experience and perception of rhetorical conventions. English for specific purposes, 36, 60-73.
Pinto, A. J. (2012). Reading more intimately: An interrogation of translation studies through selftranslation. Salesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 66–73.
Peterlin, A. P. (2016). Engagement markers in translated academic texts: Tracing translators’ interventions. English Text Construction, 9(2), 268-291.
Samha, F., Haider, A. S., & Hussein, R. F. (2023). Address forms in Egyptian vernacular and their English equivalence: A translation-oriented study. Ampersand, 100117.
Santoyo, J.-C. (2010). Translation and cultural identity: Competence and performance of the author-translator. In M. Muñoz-Calvo, & C. Buesa-Gomez (Eds.), Translation and cultural identity: Selected essays on translation and cross-cultural communication (pp. 13–32). London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v32i1.859
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Ta lim Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






